Problems & Puzzles:
Puzzles
Puzzle 229.
Primes and Hypercubes
Tony
D.
Noe
sent the following puzzle:
Here is
a prime puzzle for those who can work in higher dimensions. For which n
can the numbers from 1 to 2^n be arranged at the vertices of an
n-dimensional hypercube such that each of the n*2^(n-1) edges connects two
numbers that sum to a prime? There are simple solutions in dimensions 1
and
2:
1:
1 -- 2
2:
1 -- 2
|
|
4
-- 3
A good
place to start
with
hypercubes
is
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Hypercube.html
Mathematically, for an n-dimensional cube, the coordinates of each vertex
are (x1,x2,...,xn), where each xi is either 0 or 1. Two vertices are
connected by an edge if the coordinates of the two points are different in
only one position. For example, in 4-space, the two points (0,0,0,0) and
(1,0,0,0) are connected, but the points (1,0,0,0) and (0,0,0,1) are not
connected. All the edges are parallel (or perpendicular) to the
coordinate axes; there are no diagonal edges.
Question:
1. What is the
answer for higher dimensions?
2. If there is
more than one solution for a particular n, count the essentially different
solutions.
Solution:

Andrew Rupinski has
proved (17/8/03) that no solution exist for 3, 4 and 5-Cube. As
maybe you have already devised the proof for a 3-Cube is too elemental. I
will show only the Andrew's proof for a 4-cube because is not too large.
If you are interested in the Andrew's proof for a 5-Cube I can send
it to you on request.
Consider the possible adjacencies of each vertex. Since
each vertex of a 4-cube is connected to 4 other vertices, consider
vertex 14 which connects to exactly 4 other vertices: 3, 5, 9, and 15.
Let (0,0,0,0) = 14 and without loss of generality, assume:
(1,0,0,0) = 3
(0,1,0,0) = 5
(0,0,1,0) = 9
(0,0,0,1) = 15
Now consider possible values for the 3 vertices
(1,1,0,0) = x
(0,1,1,0) = y
(0,1,0,1) = z
Then we must have distinct x, y, z such that {3,5,14,x},
{5,9,14,y}, and {5,15,14,z} are all completions. Upon inspection, we see
that:
x = 2 or 8
y = 2 or 8
z = 2 or 8
This is clearly impossible, hence there are no prime
4-cubes.
***
Giovanni Resta
wrote (22/8/03) the following small report:
I only found a solution for the cube (8 vertices)
when the numbers start from 0 instead of 1. No solutions for 4-cube and
5-cube. A very coarse estimation suggest that with high probability there
are no solutions for larger dimensions.
***
|