|
Problems & Puzzles: Puzzles
From April 18 to 25, 2026, contributions came from Arkadiusz Wesolowski, Emilia Gurasatti *** Arkadiuz wrote:
Answer to Q3.
Let k be a Sierpiński number that has two covering sets, namely
A and B, that are disjoint,
and let U be the union of these two sets. If k > (p*q^2 - 1)/2, where p
is the second largest prime in U and q is the largest prime in U, then
k*2^n + 1 has at least three distinct
prime factors for all positive integers n.
Example:
k = 132430318140059718398963877387
223179202469722051481175208904
437986485685550827555118149321
Covering sets:
A = {5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 31, 37, 41, 61, 73, 109, 151, 241, 331},
B = {3, 23, 29, 43, 67, 71, 89, 97, 113, 127, 257, 281, 337, 353, 397,
433, 449, 577, 641, 673, 683, 1153, 1429, 2113, 2689, 5153, 5419, 6337,
7393, 20857, 38737, 65537, 86171, 122921, 312709, 599479, 6700417,
7416361, 15790321}.
k*2^1 + 1 has both 3 and 31 as prime factors.
k*2^2 + 1 has both 7 and 127 as prime factors.
k*2^3 + 1 has both 3 and 61 as prime factors.
k*2^4 + 1 has both 5 and 29 as prime factors.
k*2^5 + 1 has both 3 and 7 as prime factors.
...
Analogously, let k be a Riesel number that has two covering sets, namely
A and B, that are disjoint, and let U be the union of these two sets. If
k > (p*q^2 + 1)/2, where p is the second largest prime in U and q is the
largest prime in U, then k*2^n - 1 has at least three distinct
prime factors for all positive integers n.
Example:
k = 216138667663290358832800493328
766724738215605206192616152897
806049227643609138472430270365
Covering sets are the same as above.
k*2^1 - 1 has both 3 and 7 as prime factors.
k*2^2 - 1 has both 31 and 127 as prime factors.
k*2^3 - 1 has both 3 and 5 as prime factors.
k*2^4 - 1 has both 7 and 29 as prime factors.
k*2^5 - 1 has both 3 and 17 as prime factors.
...
It is easy to show that there exist infinitely many Sierpiński and
Riesel numbers with this property.
This statement is trivial.
We assume that k > (p*q^2 - 1)/2 to exclude the cases where, for
some odd k, k*2 + 1 has two distinct prime factors and at least one
of those factors is a prime power.
It can be show by constructing a fixed arithmetic progression modulo 2*d, where d is the product of the primes in U. *** Emilia wrote: I have found a Brier number that has at least two covering sets.k = 773553855548262449239841 (24 digits) Covering set 1: C1 = [3, 5, 17, 97, 241, 257, 673] P1 = 1031043870735 e_i1 = [2, 4, 8, 48, 24, 16, 48] e1 = 48 C2 = [3, 7, 11, 13, 19, 31, 37, 41, 61, 73, 109, 151] P2 = 196658330577361653 e_i2 = [2, 3, 10, 12, 18, 5, 36, 20, 60, 9, 36, 15] e2 = 180 C = [3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 31, 37, 41, 61, 73, 97, 109, 151, 241, 257, 673] P = 67587788790255388691025974985 e_i = [2, 4, 3, 10, 12, 8, 18, 5, 36, 20, 60, 9, 48, 36, 15, 24, 16, 48] e = 720 Covering set 2: C1 = [3, 5, 17, 97, 241, 257, 673] P1 = 1031043870735 e_i1 = [2, 4, 8, 48, 24, 16, 48] e1 = 48 C2 = [3, 7, 11, 13, 19, 31, 37, 41, 61, 73, 109, 331] P2 = 431085479609978193 e_i2 = [2, 3, 10, 12, 18, 5, 36, 20, 60, 9, 36, 30] e2 = 180 C = [3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 31, 37, 41, 61, 73, 97, 109, 241, 257, 331, 673] P = 148156013838241944746553627285 e_i = [2, 4, 3, 10, 12, 8, 18, 5, 36, 20, 60, 9, 48, 36, 24, 16, 30, 48] e = 720 The first covering set was originally used by Arkadiusz to cover k = 56284389701328043058161 (Wesołowski 5). The second one was originally used by Vantieghem to cover k=11615103277955704975673 (Vantieghem 2). Would you like to verify it? ***
|
|||
|
|||