During the week 9-15 Dec 2023,
contributions came from Giorgo Kalogeropoulos, Vicente Felipe Izquierdo,
G. Resta, Alessandro Casini, Emmanuel Vantieghem, JM Rebert
***
Giorgio wrote:
The conjecture is False.
(6*Prime(545855537) -
1)/545855537 = 133 = 7*19
For n=545855537, F(n)=133
which is NOT prime.
***
Vicente wrote:
We can define the following simple equation:
n k + 1 = 6 p1
where "p1" = Prime[n] and "k" = F[n].
We can reach the following conclusion:
"n" is of the form 1+6x and "k" is of the form
5+6y or
"n" is of the form 5+6x and "k" is of the form
1+6y
This greatly simplifies the search. All of
Sebastian's solutions are one of those 2 ways.
Q1) The conjecture is False. The first
counterexample is for: n = 5 + 6x90975922 =
545855537 where
F[n] = 133, is not prime.
Q2) The sequence continues with
n = 545855537
***
Giovanni wrote:
Counterexample:
prime(545855537) = 12099797737 and (6*12099797737 -
1) / 545855537 =
133, which is not a prime number.
the next integer values are for prime(1416486707) =
32815275379 which
gives F(n)=139 which is prime and
for prime(6971972953)= 173137328333 which gives F(n)=149
which is also
prime.
***
Alessandro wrote:
The
conjecture is false. In fact, the next number such that 6*prime(n)-1
is divisible by n is 545855537, which has a composite quotient
(133). The following one instead satisfies the conjecture's
property, that is 1416486707.
***
Emmanuel wrote:
The conjecture is not true !
The next n for which F(n)
is an integer is 545855537.
The value of F at n is
133 = 7*19, not prime.
I found two more values for
which F(n) is an integer :
1416486707 and 6971972953.
The corresponding values of
F(n) are :
I found no more integer
values for F(n) for n <= 3*10*10.
***
Rebert wrote:
F(545855537) = 133 = 7*19
is not prime
545855537 133 = 7*19 is not
prime
6971972953 149 is prime
***