Problems & Puzzles:
Conjectures
Conjecture 14.- Enoch Haga Observation about Palprimes
Patrick De Geest has been
collecting the quantity of Palprimes of every (odd)
length. Please see here.
The results of this collection up today
are:
Length of
Palprime
|
Quantity
of Palprimes
|
3
|
15
|
5
|
93
|
7
|
668
|
9
|
5172
|
11
|
42042
|
13
|
353701
|
15
|
3036643
|
17
|
27045226
|
Enoch Haga had the
inspired idea of multiplying this two columns to get a
third one: the number of digits in the total
palprimes of each length:
Length of
Palprime
|
Quantity
of Palprimes
|
Number of
digits in the total palprimes of each length
|
3
|
15
|
45
|
5
|
93
|
465
|
7
|
668
|
4676
|
9
|
5172
|
46548
|
11
|
42042
|
462462
|
13
|
353701
|
4598113
|
15
|
3036643
|
45549645
|
17
|
27045226
|
459768842
|
Can you see it?
can
you see the rate of growth of the numbers of the last
column?
its around 10 (ten) !!!
Enoch Haga wrote [Feb 28, 1999] to
Patrick:
I'm
surprised to see that the successive number of digits in
the total of palprimes from 1-digit to 17-digits seems to
increase by approximately a constant multiplier of 10.
E.g. 45 is ~ 10*4 = 40 (45 actual), 465 is ~ 10*45 = 450
(465 actual), and so on [Sloane A039657]
Enoch, immediately realized the
predictive capability of his discovery and added:
Therefore, it is easy to guess at the approximate number
of 19-digit and 21-digit palprimes (I will not hazard a
guess beyond that!). Simply divide the estimated total
number of digits by the number of digits; thus
4597688420/19 = ~ 241.983.600 19-digit palprimes.
The same procedure yields an estimate of ~ 2.189.370.676
21-digit palprimes.
Questions:
a) Can you give some
explanation about the Enoch's observation?
b) Can you predict if the rate of
growth of the third column is going to change, and
how?
***
Jud McCranie has
obtained an explanation of the Enoch's observation. Here
is his explanation:
1.-
P(D), the quantity of primes of D digits is given by:
P(D) = pi(10^D) - pi(10^(D-1)
But as pi(x) = x/ln(x) then, after some algebraic steps:
P(D) = (10 -D/(D-1)) * (10^(D-1)) / (D*ln(10))
When D>>>>1, then, approximately:
P(D) = 9 * (10^(D-1)) / (D*ln(10))
2.- FPal(D), the fraction of Palindromic numbers of D
digits is given by:
FPal(D) = (10^((3-D)/2))/9
3.- Then, Ppal(D) the quantity of Palindromic primes of D
digits is given by a combination of the two previous
results:
Ppal(D) = P(D) * FPal(D) = (10^(D-1))/(D*ln(10)) *
(10^((3-D)/2)) =
= 10^((D+1)/2)/(D*ln(10))
Then approximately: D*
Ppal(D) = 10^((D+1)/2)/(ln(10))
As you can see, D* Ppal(D) is the "Total Digits of
all the Palprimes of D digits", that is to say, D*
Ppal(D) is the third column calculated by Enoch Haga.
But 10^((D+1)/2) increases by a factor of 10 every time D
increases two units, so this explains the Haga's
observation.
Regarding the quantity of Palprimes of D digits the
answer is given - without any simplification - by:
Ppal(D) = P(D) * FPal(D) =
Ppal(D) = (10 -D/(D-1)) * (10^(D-1))/(D*ln(10)) *
(10^((3-D)/2))/9 =
then:
D*Ppal(D) = (10 -D/(D-1)) *
10^((D+1)/2) /(9*ln(10))
This
answer the two questions posed.
***
|